Government Contracting

Construction Contract Dispute Resolution: Complete Contractor Guide 2025

Learn about construction contract dispute resolution methods. Understand claims, negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and litigation for government construction disputes.

ConstructionBids Team
December 20, 2025
14 min read

Introduction

Disputes are an unfortunate reality in construction. Complex projects, multiple parties, changing conditions, and competing interests create friction. How you handle disputes—from prevention through resolution— significantly impacts project success and profitability.

Government construction adds unique dispute procedures. Federal contracts follow the Contract Disputes Act with specific claim requirements. State and local contracts have their own procedures. Understanding these processes protects your rights and positions you for fair resolution.

This guide covers dispute prevention, claim procedures, and resolution methods available to contractors in government construction.

Key Dispute Resolution Concepts

  • Claim: Written assertion seeking payment, adjustment, or interpretation
  • Dispute: Unresolved claim requiring formal resolution
  • ADR: Alternative dispute resolution (mediation, arbitration)
  • CDA: Contract Disputes Act (federal contracts)
  • COFD: Contracting Officer's Final Decision

Common Dispute Types

Understanding common dispute categories helps with both prevention and resolution preparation.

Scope and Change Disputes

  • Constructive changes (owner direction without formal change order)
  • Differing site conditions (Type I - different from contract, Type II - unknown)
  • Design errors and omissions
  • Scope interpretation disagreements
  • Disputed change order pricing

Schedule and Delay Disputes

  • Excusable vs. compensable delays
  • Concurrent delays
  • Acceleration claims (directed or constructive)
  • Liquidated damages disputes
  • Extended general conditions claims

Payment Disputes

  • Progress payment withholding
  • Retainage release issues
  • Change order pricing disagreements
  • Backcharge disputes
  • Final payment and close-out issues

Other Common Disputes

  • Termination (for cause vs. convenience)
  • Warranty claims
  • Subcontractor pass-through claims
  • Suspension of work impacts
  • Contract interpretation differences

Dispute Prevention

The best dispute is the one that never happens. Proactive management prevents many conflicts.

Before Contract Award

  • Thorough document review during bidding
  • Submit RFIs to clarify ambiguities
  • Note potential issues in bid qualifications
  • Understand dispute resolution provisions
  • Review risk allocation carefully

During Contract Execution

  • Contemporaneous documentation of everything
  • Immediate written notice of issues
  • Follow notice requirements exactly
  • Regular communication with owner/A-E
  • Address issues early before they escalate

Relationship Management

  • Build trust through consistent performance
  • Communicate proactively about problems
  • Seek win-win solutions to issues
  • Keep disagreements professional
  • Escalate appropriately when needed

The Claims Process

When disputes arise, following proper claims procedures is essential to preserving your rights.

Notice Requirements

Most contracts require timely written notice:

  • Notice of intent to claim (often 10-21 days)
  • Specific notice for different claim types
  • Failure to notify may waive claim
  • Include all required information
  • Deliver per contract requirements

Claim Submission

Elements of a proper claim submission:

  • Written demand for specific relief
  • Contract provisions supporting claim
  • Factual basis with documentation
  • Calculation of damages
  • Certification (required for federal claims over $100,000)

Claim Quantum

Damage TypeDescription
Direct CostsLabor, materials, equipment for changed work
Extended Home OfficeOverhead during delay (Eichleay formula)
Field OverheadExtended site costs during delay
Lost ProductivityInefficiency due to disruption
EscalationPrice increases from delay

Resolution Methods

Multiple paths exist for resolving construction disputes, from informal negotiation through binding litigation.

Negotiation

Direct Discussion

  • Least costly approach
  • Preserves relationships
  • Fastest potential resolution
  • Requires good faith from both parties
  • Consider escalating levels of management

Mediation

Facilitated Negotiation

  • Neutral third party facilitates discussion
  • Non-binding unless agreement reached
  • Lower cost than arbitration/litigation
  • Parties control outcome
  • Confidential process

Arbitration

Binding Decision by Neutral

  • Private hearing before arbitrator(s)
  • Faster and less formal than court
  • Limited discovery and appeals
  • Decision typically binding
  • May be required by contract

Litigation

Court Resolution

  • Formal court procedures
  • Full discovery rights
  • Appeal rights available
  • Most expensive and time-consuming
  • Public record

Comparison of Methods

MethodCostTimeControl
NegotiationLowFastHigh
MediationLow-MediumFast-MediumHigh
ArbitrationMedium-HighMediumLow
LitigationHighSlowLow

Federal Contract Disputes

Federal construction contracts follow the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), which establishes specific procedures.

Contract Disputes Act Process

Step 1: Submit Claim to Contracting Officer

  • Written claim requesting specific relief
  • Claims over $100,000 require certification
  • Submit within 6 years of accrual

Step 2: Contracting Officer Decision

  • CO must issue decision in reasonable time
  • Under $100K: 60 days
  • Over $100K: 60 days or notify when expected
  • Decision includes appeal rights notice

Step 3: Appeal Options

  • Board of Contract Appeals (90 days)
  • Court of Federal Claims (12 months)
  • Can continue work during appeal (unless ordered otherwise)

Important CDA Provisions

  • Interest: Accrues from claim submission
  • Certified claims: Fraud penalties apply for false certification
  • Continue performance: Must continue work during disputes
  • ADR: Federal agencies encouraged to use ADR

Documentation Best Practices

Strong documentation is essential for claim success. Document contemporaneously—recreating records later is difficult and less credible.

Daily Documentation

  • Daily reports with detailed information
  • Workforce counts by trade/activity
  • Weather conditions and impacts
  • Equipment on site and usage
  • Visitors and direction received
  • Work accomplished and problems encountered

Correspondence

  • Confirm verbal direction in writing
  • Send written notice immediately when issues arise
  • Document owner delays and impacts
  • Keep copies of all correspondence
  • Maintain organized files

Photo and Video

  • Photograph conditions before starting work
  • Document differing site conditions
  • Record progress regularly
  • Capture issues when they occur
  • Include date/time stamps

Schedule Documentation

  • Maintain contemporaneous schedule updates
  • Document delay causes and impacts
  • Keep schedule analyses for claims
  • Record actual vs. planned progress

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if I miss a notice deadline?

Missing contractual notice deadlines can waive your claim rights entirely. Some courts allow recovery if the owner wasn't prejudiced by late notice, but don't rely on this. Set up systems to ensure timely notice for all potential claims.

Should I continue working during a dispute?

Generally yes. Stopping work without authorization can be treated as default. For federal contracts, the CDA requires continued performance. Document your position, reserve rights, and continue working while pursuing resolution.

When should I involve an attorney?

Consider legal counsel for significant claims, complex issues, or before major decisions affecting claim rights. Early involvement helps ensure proper documentation and procedures. The cost is usually worthwhile for substantial disputes.

How do I handle subcontractor claims?

As prime contractor, you typically must "pass through" sub claims to the owner. This requires the sub to support the claim and often assign prosecution to you. Your subcontract should address claim handling and cooperation requirements.

Conclusion

Dispute resolution is an essential competency for construction contractors. Focus first on prevention through clear communication, thorough documentation, and proactive issue resolution. When disputes arise, follow proper procedures and consider all resolution options.

Strong documentation practices, understanding of contract requirements, and appropriate legal support position you for fair resolution when conflicts are unavoidable.

Find Government Construction Opportunities

ConstructionBids.ai helps you find government construction opportunities. Understanding dispute resolution procedures is part of successful government contracting.

Start Finding Opportunities →

Ready to Find Your Next Contract?

Get instant access to thousands of government construction bids with our AI-powered platform.

Get Started