Proposal Writing

Technical Proposal Writing Guide: Win Government Contracts in 2025

Learn how to write winning technical proposals for government contracts. Master evaluation criteria, compliance matrices, and strategies to outscore competitors.

BidFinds Government Contracting Team
January 4, 2026
16 min read

Quick Answer: What Makes a Winning Technical Proposal?

A winning technical proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of requirements, presents a compelling solution, proves your capability to deliver, and differentiates you from competitors. It's not about writing ability—it's about showing evaluators you're the best choice.

40-60%
Typical Weight
M-3-6
Rating Scale
100%
Compliance Required
3+ Min
Evaluator Review

What is a Technical Proposal?

The technical proposal (or technical volume) is where you present your solution to the government's requirements. It's your opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of the work, your approach to performing it, and your qualifications to deliver successfully.

Unlike a commercial sales proposal focused on persuasion, a government technical proposal must be structured to facilitate objective evaluation against specific criteria defined in the solicitation.

Technical Proposal Components

1

Technical Approach

How you will accomplish the work—methodologies, processes, tools

2

Management Approach

How you will manage the contract—organization, communications, quality control

3

Staffing/Key Personnel

Who will perform the work—qualifications, experience, availability

4

Corporate Experience

Your relevant past performance—similar projects, client references

Understanding Evaluation Criteria

Every technical proposal is evaluated against criteria specified in Section M of the RFP. Understanding these criteria is essential—they tell you exactly what the government values.

Common Rating Scales

OutstandingExceeds requirements; innovative approach with significant benefits
GoodExceeds some requirements; no significant weaknesses
AcceptableMeets requirements; some weaknesses but none significant
MarginalDoesn't clearly meet requirements; significant weaknesses
UnacceptableFails to meet requirements; deficiency not correctable

Key Insight

"Acceptable" is often good enough to win on price. But in competitive best-value procurements, you need "Good" or "Outstanding" ratings to justify a higher price or beat lower-priced competitors.

Proposal Structure Best Practices

1

Mirror the RFP Structure

Organize your proposal exactly as the evaluation criteria are organized. This makes it easy for evaluators to find your responses to each requirement.

2

Use Descriptive Headings

Don't just repeat the RFP language. Create headings that tell your story: "Our Proven Approach to Quality Assurance" instead of just "Quality Assurance."

3

Lead with Benefits

Start each section with a theme statement that highlights your key discriminator or benefit. Don't bury your strongest points.

4

Use Graphics Strategically

Well-designed graphics communicate complex information quickly. Include action captions that reinforce your win themes and make key points unmissable.

Developing Win Themes

Win themes are the key messages that differentiate you from competitors. They should be woven throughout your proposal, appearing in theme statements, graphics, and proof points.

Characteristics of Strong Win Themes

  • Customer-Focused: Express benefits to the government, not features of your company
  • Discriminating: Highlight what makes you different from competitors
  • Provable: Support with specific evidence, examples, and data
  • Relevant: Align with what the evaluation criteria value

Weak Theme

"We have 20 years of experience in IT services."

(Feature-focused, not customer-focused, easy for competitors to match)

Strong Theme

"Our proven cloud migration methodology reduces transition risk by 40%, ensuring uninterrupted mission operations."

(Benefit-focused, specific, addresses government concern)

Winning Writing Strategies

Be Specific, Not Generic

Replace vague claims with concrete details. Instead of "highly qualified team," specify "12 engineers with TS/SCI clearances and average 8 years DoD experience."

Use Active Voice

Active voice is clearer and more compelling. "Our team will implement..." is stronger than "Implementation will be performed by our team..."

Show Understanding

Demonstrate you understand the government's challenges and mission. Reference their environment, constraints, and objectives—not just the PWS requirements.

Prove Everything

Back up claims with evidence: past performance examples, metrics, testimonials, certifications. Unsupported claims hurt credibility.

The STAR Method for Examples

When citing past performance, use the STAR format:

Situation: Describe the context and challenge
Task: Explain what you were asked to do
Action: Detail the specific steps you took
Result: Quantify the outcome and benefits achieved

Compliance and Formatting

Non-compliance can disqualify an otherwise excellent proposal. Pay careful attention to all RFP instructions.

Common RFP Requirements

  • Page Limits: Strict page counts that cannot be exceeded
  • Font Requirements: Specific fonts, sizes, and margins
  • File Formats: PDF, Word, Excel requirements for different volumes
  • Section Organization: Required order and structure
  • Required Content: Specific topics that must be addressed

Create a Compliance Matrix

Build a compliance matrix mapping every RFP requirement to where it's addressed in your proposal. Use this to verify completeness before submission and include it in your proposal if permitted—it makes the evaluator's job easier.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Using Boilerplate

    Generic text copied from past proposals shows lack of understanding and effort.

  • Focusing on Yourself

    Proposals should focus on the government's needs and how you'll meet them, not your company history.

  • Making Unsupported Claims

    Every claim needs evidence. "We are the best" means nothing without proof.

  • Ignoring the Incumbent

    If there's an incumbent, address transition and explain how you'll match or exceed their performance.

  • Weak Executive Summary

    The exec summary sets the tone. Make it compelling, not a dry repeat of proposal contents.

  • Last-Minute Submission

    Rushing leads to errors. Allow time for thorough review, formatting checks, and potential technical issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should a technical proposal be?

Follow the RFP's page limits exactly. If no limit is given, be as concise as possible while fully addressing all requirements. Quality over quantity—evaluators appreciate clear, focused proposals.

Should I include resumes in the technical volume?

Usually resumes go in an appendix or separate volume, but check the RFP instructions. In the technical volume, summarize key personnel qualifications and reference the detailed resumes.

Can I exceed page limits for graphics?

Generally no. Graphics typically count against page limits unless the RFP explicitly exempts them. Some RFPs allow fold-out pages or exempt certain graphics—read carefully.

How do I handle requirements I can't fully meet?

Address them directly and explain your mitigation approach. Ignoring a requirement is worse than acknowledging a gap and presenting a credible plan to address it. Consider whether partnering could help.

Should I submit questions during the Q&A period?

Yes, if you have legitimate questions about requirements. However, avoid questions that reveal your strategy or make you look unprepared. Questions are often published to all offerors.

Find Opportunities to Apply Your Proposal Skills

Ready to write your next winning proposal? BidFinds helps you discover federal contract opportunities matched to your capabilities. Start finding your next win today.

Start Finding Opportunities

Ready to Find Your Next Contract?

Get instant access to thousands of government construction bids with our AI-powered platform.

Get Started